Previous Entry | Next Entry

audio-visual asplosion

  • Aug. 6th, 2006 at 5:28 PM
pontisbright: pontisbright (Default)
I have watched many many things. This is justifiable through the need to sit quite still in a chair with some poo on my hair for several hours yesterday, neatly encased in a most attractive cling-film head-condom. (OK, so I only had to do that for about 3 hours, but still, a wide range of viewing materials pre-henna, mid-henna, and post-henna when one is wondering how it will turn out is perfectly legitimate. For those interested, I succeeded in only dyeing my hair and not various other portions of my anatomy, nor indeed my bathroom, and am now more pleasingly red than before - which counts as a triumph, I feel.)

So, the viewage:


Death of a Ghost is very yay. Lots of wintry London (overcoats!), Lugg being gloriously stroppy about not getting to have any fun, a character called Tom Daker which sounds rather too much like Tom Baker and causes inadvertent amusement, and drunken Albert. 'My biscuit is soggy', he says, and kisses the sphinxes at Cleopatra's Needle. Hurrah.


The Aztecs is successfully converting me to that nice old First Doctor. (I have only seen The Keys of Marinus before, and he's on holiday for most of it.) Him and Cameca are lovely, as is the scene where Ian tells him he's a randy old bastard. (I may have made up my own dialogue for that bit.) Barbara actually is a Goddess, as we all know, so that's all jolly good, and she pwns due to having Actual Knowledge of Aztec civilization, which makes her a Very Excellent Companion and much cleverer than the Doctor really. Speaking of which...


Destiny of the Daleks close on the heels of City of Death has confirmed it: I am now officially Gay for Romana II. I appreciate I am a bit late to this party, but I got distracted by that episode of The Professionals where she shagged Doyle and then turned out to be evil (obviously). And how did I not know that the pink outfit is a replica of his? I am a fool. She is the Doctor we are allowed to be, I think: Tom exudes so much Tomness that we are always observing him, never really in his head, but we can be a Time Lady who is clever and funny and has wonderful boots but also gets pinned to a wall by scary Daleks and has a bit of a cry. Oh, and the bit when she is in the tube? EEP. I was proper scared. Anyway, I have not seen anything else with her in yet, meaning I have lots of happy hours of loveliness and outfits still to come.

(Cross-dressing companions are good, aren't they? I would've liked Rose more if she'd done drag. Maybe Martha will oblige.)


OK, this definitely had nothing to do with hair as I actually had to go out of the house to an actual cinema. The Notorious Bettie Page is a wee flim which is, er, ok. Gretchen Mol has a fantastic pair of norks, it must be said (although not quite the Bettie bum'n'hips combo), but the screenplay's a bit flat. And they sort of footle around the pornography issue, pointedly showing you the hilarious 'naughty' movies where girls covered practically head-to-toe in unattractive underwear playfully pretend to slap each other on the arse (tee hee, fancy! people thought this sort of thing was for deviants!), but then casually throwing in a few shots of girls tied up in full-on scary rape scenarios (uh-oh, some of these shots still look massively dodgy even by modern standards, especially in the context of a film about a woman who was serially abused...er...look! here are some nice outfits!).

To be fair, that is largely the same footling I myself do on the subject of porn. And the outfits were very pretty. 50s Americana so wins over the Sea of Brownness and Rationing of Blighty.

Now exhausted. Shall collapse in front of telly to recover...

Comments

[identity profile] pontisbright.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 6th, 2006 09:34 pm (UTC)
'xactly. That's what companions should do, ffs. There's only so much ankle-twisting and question-asking that any story needs, and that any character can survive without becoming impossibly unappealing. Whereas a companion who has a bit of clout about them and occasionally get to kick him a bit has longevity and fabulousness - and makes the Doctor that much more appealing by association. Even just that bit in WOTD where Tegan pwns both Five and Turlough when they can't open the door and she can? That's brilliant.

I would like Ten more if he had someone to point out to him the bits when he is a twat, instead of gazing at him in doe-eyed handholdy lust. *crosses fingers helplessly*
[identity profile] taleya.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 6th, 2006 09:39 pm (UTC)
Hopefully we'll get that now Rose is gone. They can't do the "falling in love again" because it will alienate and destroy RTD's little Mary Sue fantasy...so we'll get a more platonic pov.

And Jack is supposed to be back S3. W00000000000000000!
[identity profile] pontisbright.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 6th, 2006 10:30 pm (UTC)
I want Ten and Jack in big gigantic conflict. Possibly having some fisticuffs.

I am totally fascinated to see wtf they do with Martha. I'm sort of hoping they either go historical or alien with her, but there are problems with both of those. Somehow doubt they'll stick with the 'popping back home to Mum's' business (which will be a good thing, despite my Jackielove), anyway.
[identity profile] taleya.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 6th, 2006 10:59 pm (UTC)
Oh yeah. Tenth gets out of the TARDIS and Jack just pops him one :D

It should be interesting. Between the left behind on Sat 5 and working with Torchwood, who at best are ambivalent about the Doctor...it will be interesting to see how his perceptions have changed. It will be interesting if they work that in - it can be a very subtle mental programming (or illusion shattering). The Doctor isn't a hero, he's a brutal meddler..and as Jack can attest he will quite happily leave a good friend behind on a satellite full of corpses. *bounces excitedly*

* yes yes I know they probably won't do it, but don't shatter my illusions, dammit!
[identity profile] pontisbright.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 6th, 2006 11:05 pm (UTC)
Ooh, yes please. Of course, Ten isn't exactly keen on Torchwood either, so they'll both have good reason to be pissy with each other.

Will be interesting to see how much they tie the two show together: they can't make DW reliant on knowledge of what happens in Torchwood for obvious reasons, but it will be frankly strange to have spent all that time banging on about the bloody place all season and then have characters crossing over without it being in some way referenced.

I really hope they don't just handwave the whole 'we left Jack behind' thing the way they did in the CIN thingy. Because Jack is entirely entitled to get way pissy about that.

Mmm, two lovely pretty anti-heroes, getting all shouty with one another...S3 is going to kick S2's little botty, isn't it?

You know that thing about not shattering people's illusions? ;)
[identity profile] taleya.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 6th, 2006 11:11 pm (UTC)
Well realistically we should see on occasion Jack coming across references to the Doctor. It does depend on what time period Torchwood is set in as well - I'm placing money on their first season finale happening just before the events in TCI - they do mention that Torchwood had lost the majority of their staff and that was why it was taking them so long to get the weaponry online.

It's going to be interesting to see how they do it. I mean, if Jack wants to hook back up with the Doctor, the first bloody thing he's going to do is go look up Jackie Tyler - and then get a hold of Rose through those channels. (Unless of course he does that and it's pre-2005 series and realises that she hasn't met him yet) Which is a bit of a bummer because I just had this heartbreaking mental image of Jack arriving on the scene in TCI just after the TARDIS leaves again...
[identity profile] pontisbright.livejournal.com wrote:
Aug. 7th, 2006 03:01 pm (UTC)
I think I read somewhere that Jack knew something that the Doctor didn't, or that the Doctor knew something that Torchwood needed to know, or...it was something like that. Not clear on whether that'll be the entire Torchwood season arc, or if that's just going to be a starting point (of course it would help if my brain could actually remember the quote, ahem).

That would be gutting, Jack getting left TWICE. But I sort of hope they keep away from the Tylers, and let Jack start over a bit. He needs to be all broody and wanting to prove himself, only fucking up as the one person who showed him what a good guy he was capable of being is gradually revealed by the Torchwood files to have been as much a cause of disaster as of good...?